@article{oai:u-ryukyu.repo.nii.ac.jp:02002439,
 author = {林, 大五郎 and Hayashi, Daigoro},
 issue = {1},
 journal = {情報地質 ＝ Geological data processing (Geoinformatics)},
 note = {I have performed the three dimensional strain analysis of the Kayo Formation, Kunchan Group around Ban-zaki, middle north of Okinawa-jima by means of the "least square method" and "average method". The least square method was called the "strain analysis technique 3" and the average method was called the "strain analysis technique 2" in my paper (Hayashi, 1994). The results of both methods are fairly different. The "c-value" is introduced to explain the difference. The difference between the strain ellipsoid calculated using the least square method and associated strain ellipses decreases as the c-value decreases, though the difference between the strain ellipsoid calculated using the average method and associated strain ellipses does not necessarily decrease. Therefore, the strain ellipsoid obtained by the least square method is expected to approach a true strain ellipsoid as the c-value decreases, though the strain ellipsoid obtained by the average method is not expected to approach a true strain ellipsoid., 沖縄島中北部バン崎周辺の国頭層群嘉陽層の３次元歪解析を最小２乗法と平均法で行った．最小２乗法とは林（1994）の「歪解析法３」のことであり，平均法とは同じく「歪解析法２」のことである．両者の結果はかなりくい違った．これを解明するため歪楕円体の適合性をあらわすｃ値を導入した．最小２乗法によって得られた歪楕円体はｃ値が小さくなると歪楕円との差が小さくなった．しかし平均法の場合にはかならずしも小さくならない．このため，最小２乗法から得られた歪楕円体はｃ値が小さくなると真の歪楕円体に近づくことが期待されるが，平均法の場合には期待できない．, 論文},
 pages = {13--29},
 title = {地質構造解析における歪楕円体の適合度ｃ値の提唱},
 volume = {6}
}