{"created":"2022-01-27T07:31:15.089571+00:00","id":2003341,"links":{},"metadata":{"_buckets":{"deposit":"37dbe580-b134-42de-a76d-1f78a34a3b62"},"_deposit":{"id":"2003341","owners":[1],"pid":{"revision_id":0,"type":"depid","value":"2003341"},"status":"published"},"_oai":{"id":"oai:u-ryukyu.repo.nii.ac.jp:02003341","sets":["1642837622505:1642837905044:1642837909579","1642838403551:1642838407312"]},"author_link":[],"item_1617186331708":{"attribute_name":"Title","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_title":"ビルマ植民地,マレー植民地,タイ国半植民地(東南アジアにおけるイギリス帝国主義の森林開発の展開 (II) )(林学科)","subitem_title_language":"ja"},{"subitem_title":"Burmese Colony, Malay Colony and the Thailand half colonized (Development of Forest Exploitation by British Imperialism in South-East Asia (II) ) (Department of Forestry)","subitem_title_language":"en"}]},"item_1617186419668":{"attribute_name":"Creator","attribute_type":"creator","attribute_value_mlt":[{"creatorNames":[{"creatorName":"篠原, 武夫","creatorNameLang":"ja"}]},{"creatorNames":[{"creatorName":"Shinohara, Takeo","creatorNameLang":"en"}]}]},"item_1617186476635":{"attribute_name":"Access Rights","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_access_right":"open access","subitem_access_right_uri":"http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2"}]},"item_1617186626617":{"attribute_name":"Description","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_description":"(1)ビルマ植民地。イギリス帝国主義はビルマ植民地の森林資源(チーク林)を独占的に支配するために,まず森林資源の国家的所有を実現し,民間商社のチーク林伐採は政府発行の特許によって行ない,それは主に自国独占商社に与えられた。その結果,ビルマ人民の自主的経営は禁止され,全ビルマのチーク林資源はイギリス帝国主義の独占的支配下におかれたのである。このようにして経済的価値の高いチーク林資源はイギリス帝国主義に収奪され,それはビルマ人民の経済からまったく遊離することになったのである。(2)マレー植民地。イギリス帝国はマレーの植民地化に際して,全マレーの土地・森林を国有した。イギリス帝国のとったマレーの植民地政策は,国際的ゴム景気の影響によって,独占資本が森林をとらえた時に,そこには木材生産を主目的とする生産形態でなく,栽植農業を中心としたゴム開発に主力がそそがれ,そのため国有林は農業開発資本と結合して独占利潤追求に奉仕するようになった。そのことは栽植農業(主にゴム)に対するイギリス投資が全投資額の約9割近くに達し,森林資源が豊富に存するにもかかわらず,林業開発に対するイギリスの投資がみられないといったことから明らかであろう。それはまた農業開発に伴って成立した林政が林業生産面で消極的であったこと,および木材生産の担い手が主に支那人で,彼らによる木材生産は国内需要を十分にみたし得なかったこと,などからもわかろう。このようにマレー林業の後進性をもたらした最も基本的な原因は,イギリス帝国主義のとった産業政策の偏倚性,すなわち森林開発=農業開発という政策のあり方に起因していたと言えよう。(3)タイ国半植民地。純然たる植民地における独占資本の森林開発は,宗主国の国家的林野所有を舞台にして展開されるので,森林資源の独占的開発はきわめて容易に進行するが,領土的支配までにいたらない半植民地タイ国の森林開発では,森林がイギリス帝国の所有でないので,同帝国はもっぱら強力な資本力をテコに,まずは林政改革の実権を掌握して,自国独占資本による森林の支配の活動を有利に導き,他の資本を圧倒して森林資源(チーク林)の独占的開発を可能にして行ったのである。イギリス独占資本の支配力は森林の生産過程はもとより,流通過程にまでおよんでいるので,チーク林からの独占利潤の享受は大きかったと言えよう。以上のようなメカニズムを通じてタイ国半植民地の森林資源は,ヨーロッパ資本,なかでもイギリス独占資本の開発下におかれたのである。","subitem_description_type":"Other"},{"subitem_description":"(1) Burmese Colony. Since British Imperialism wanted to exclusively dominate forest resources (Tectona grandis=Teak) in Burmese Colony, she first realized the national possession of forest resources and the exploitation of Tectona grandis by private firms was done by concession which Colonial Government issued and the concession was mainly given to British capital. As the result, independ management of the forest by Burmese was prohibited and Tectona Grandis resources in all Burma was put under monopolistic rule by British Imperialism. Through this way, Tectona grandis which economical value is high, was dominated and it was entirely isolated from the Burmese economy. (2) Malay Colony. When British Imperialism ruled Malay territory as colony, she nationalized the land and forest in all Malay. Colonial policy which British Imperialism took to Malay was not the policy which the form of production in this forest did not mainly aim at the timber production by the influence on international rubber boom, when the monopolistic capital caught the forest. That is to say, its policy was chiefly the policy to plantation agriculture, and it was specially poured into rubber growing among the plantation agriculture. Therefore, while national forest combined with the capital for agricultural exploitation, its forest served for the pursuit of monolistic profit. In this way, the just basic cause which the backwardness of Malay forestry took place, originated in the character of inclination of industrial policy. Namely, it resulted from the policy which forest exploitation was excuted as agricultural exploitation. (3) The Thailand half colonized. National forest was not the possession of British Imperialism on forest exploition in the Thailand half colonized. So, British Imperialism first took real authority to reform the forest administration (= policy) chiefly by the power of her strong capital and led the domination of the forest by British monopolistic capital into profit and overpowered other capital and turned the monopolistic exploitation of forest resources (Tectona grandis) into a possibility. We can say that the monopolistic profit which was gained from the Tectona grandis was very gross so that British monopolistic capital might dominate not only the production process (=place) of the forest, but also the market process. The forest resources in the Thailand half colonized were mainy dominated by British capital among European capital through the mechanism mentioned above.","subitem_description_type":"Other"},{"subitem_description":"紀要論文","subitem_description_type":"Other"}]},"item_1617186643794":{"attribute_name":"Publisher","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_publisher":"琉球大学農学部","subitem_publisher_language":"ja"}]},"item_1617186702042":{"attribute_name":"Language","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_language":"jpn"}]},"item_1617186783814":{"attribute_name":"Identifier","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_identifier_type":"HDL","subitem_identifier_uri":"http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12000/4349"}]},"item_1617186920753":{"attribute_name":"Source Identifier","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_source_identifier":"0370-4246","subitem_source_identifier_type":"ISSN"},{"subitem_source_identifier":"AN00250548","subitem_source_identifier_type":"NCID"}]},"item_1617186941041":{"attribute_name":"Source Title","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_source_title":"琉球大学農学部学術報告","subitem_source_title_language":"ja"},{"subitem_source_title":"The Science Bulletin of the Faculty of Agriculture. University of the Ryukyus","subitem_source_title_language":"en"}]},"item_1617187056579":{"attribute_name":"Bibliographic Information","attribute_value_mlt":[{"bibliographicIssueDates":{"bibliographicIssueDate":"1975-12-01","bibliographicIssueDateType":"Issued"},"bibliographicIssueNumber":"22","bibliographicPageEnd":"586","bibliographicPageStart":"575"}]},"item_1617258105262":{"attribute_name":"Resource Type","attribute_value_mlt":[{"resourcetype":"departmental bulletin paper","resourceuri":"http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501"}]},"item_1617265215918":{"attribute_name":"Version Type","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_version_resource":"http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85","subitem_version_type":"VoR"}]},"item_1617605131499":{"attribute_name":"File","attribute_type":"file","attribute_value_mlt":[{"accessrole":"open_access","filename":"KJ00000162534.pdf","mimetype":"application/pdf","url":{"objectType":"fulltext","url":"https://u-ryukyu.repo.nii.ac.jp/record/2003341/files/KJ00000162534.pdf"},"version_id":"99424f4b-5fb0-4538-88b6-e0104a4b86c2"}]},"item_title":"ビルマ植民地,マレー植民地,タイ国半植民地(東南アジアにおけるイギリス帝国主義の森林開発の展開 (II) )(林学科)","item_type_id":"15","owner":"1","path":["1642837909579","1642838407312"],"pubdate":{"attribute_name":"PubDate","attribute_value":"2008-02-14"},"publish_date":"2008-02-14","publish_status":"0","recid":"2003341","relation_version_is_last":true,"title":["ビルマ植民地,マレー植民地,タイ国半植民地(東南アジアにおけるイギリス帝国主義の森林開発の展開 (II) )(林学科)"],"weko_creator_id":"1","weko_shared_id":-1},"updated":"2022-10-31T01:20:19.418381+00:00"}