@article{oai:u-ryukyu.repo.nii.ac.jp:02011029,
 author = {Kondo, Yutaka and Fukuda, Tatsuma and Uchimido, Ryo and Kashiura, Masahiro and Kato, Soichiro and Sekiguchi, Hiroshi and Zamami, Yoshito and Hifumi, Toru and Hayashida, Kei},
 journal = {Frontiers in Medicine},
 month = {Mar},
 note = {Background: Advanced Life Support (ALS) is regarded to be associated with improved survival in pre-hospital trauma care when compared to Basic Life Support (BLS) irrespective of lack of evidence. The aim of this study is to ascertain ALS improves survival for trauma in prehospital settings when compared to BLS.\nMethods: We searched PubMed, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials for published controlled trials (CTs), and observational studies that were published until Aug 2017. The population of interest were adults (>18 years old) trauma patients who were transported by ground transportation and required resuscitation in prehospital settings. We compared outcomes between the ALS and BLS groups. The primary outcome was in-hospital mortality and secondary outcomes were neurological outcome and time spent on scene.\nResults: We identified 2,502 studies from various databases and 10 studies were included in the analysis (two CTs, and eight observational studies). The outcomes were not statistically significant between the ALS and BLS groups (pooled OR 1.14; 95% CI 0.95 to 1.36 for mortality, pooled OR 1.12; 95% CI 0.88 to 1.42 for good neurological outcomes, pooled mean difference −0.96; 95% CI−6.64 to 4.72 for on-scene time) in CTs. In observational studies, ALS prolonged on-scene time and increased mortality (pooled OR 1.56; 95% CI: 1.31 to 1.86 for mortality, and pooled mean difference, 1.26; 95% CI: 0.07 to 2.45 for on-scene time)., 論文},
 title = {Advanced Life Support vs. Basic Life Support for Patients With Trauma in Prehospital Settings : A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis},
 volume = {8},
 year = {2021}
}