@article{oai:u-ryukyu.repo.nii.ac.jp:02016124,
 author = {豊見山, 健 and 川野, 幸志 and 砂川, 宏樹 and 平良, 勝己 and 比嘉, 宇郎 and 久高, 学 and 照屋, 剛 and 大城, 健誠 and 山城, 和也 and 稲福, 行夫 and 久高, 弘志 and 与儀, 実津夫 and Tomiyama, Takeshi and Kawano, Koji and Sunagawa, Hiroki and Taira, Katsumi and Higa, Takao and Kudaka, Manabu and Teruya, Tsuyoshi and Ohshiro, Kensei and Yamashiro, Kazuya and Inafuku, Yukuo and Kudaka, Hiroshi and Yogi, Mituo},
 issue = {1},
 journal = {琉球医学会誌 = Ryukyu Medical Journal},
 month = {},
 note = {Since February 1999, we have employed a bilayer patch device (PROLENE Hernia System: PHS) for the treatment of adult groin hernia. The patch comprises three components: an underlay patch, an onlay patch and a cylindrical connector. The underlay patch is similar to that used in preperitoneal repair. The onlay patch is similar to that used in Lichtenstein repair, and the cylindrical connector is similar to the mesh plug. We studied a series of 192 patients with adult inguinal hernia treated surgically at our hospital. Patients were divided into three groups based on repair type. Thirty-eight PHS repairs were compared with 57 laparoscopic hernioplasties and 97 conventional hernioplasties, which were performed between January 1995 and December 1999. PHS repair was markedly superior to the conventional methods in terms of postoperative pain, ambulation and hospital stay. PHS repair was also advantageous over laparoscopic hernioplasty with regard to operation time, cost, anesthesia required and operative technique.  With PHS, mean operation time was shortened, costs were relatively low, general anesthesia was not required, and the operative technique was quite easy. We believe that PHS repair will become a standard procedure for adult inguinal hernia repair., 論文},
 pages = {21--24},
 title = {[原著］当院における成人鼠径ヘルニア手術症例の検討 : 特にbilayer patch device (PHS法)の有用性について},
 volume = {20},
 year = {2001}
}