@article{oai:u-ryukyu.repo.nii.ac.jp:02016214,
 author = {狩野, 岳史 and 砂川, 元 and 諸岡, 真 and 新崎, 章 and 新垣, 敬一 and 森田, 奈苗 and 知念, 克二 and 甲元, 文子 and 立津, 政晴 and 山口, ゆかり and 山田, 桂子 and 藤井, 信男 and Kano, Takeshi and Sunakawa, Hajime and Morooka, Makoto and Arasaki, Akira and Arakaki, Keiichi and Morita, Nanae and Chinen, Katsuni and Komoto, Fumiko and Tatetsu, Masaharu and Yamaguchi, Yukari and Yamada, Keiko and Fujii, Nobuo},
 issue = {1},
 journal = {琉球医学会誌 = Ryukyu Medical Journal},
 note = {We retrospectively analyzed the treatment results of 21 ameloblastoma cases over the past 14 years (1988 to 2002). Results were summarized as follows: 1. The sample consisted of 16 males and 5 females with ages between 9 to 68 years (average 29.6 years). 2. Two cases were found in the maxilla and 19 cases in the mandible. 3. Radiography revealed 10 cases of unilocular, 7 0f multilocular, and 2 of honeycomb. 4. Pathologically, 12 cases were plexiform type, 6 were follicular type, and 3 were acanthoma type. 5. Two cases underwent marsupilization, 15 cases underwent enucleation followed by removal of adjacent bone, and 4 cases underwent radical treatment (1 partial maxilloectomy, 1 marginal resection of mandible, 1 block resection, 1 hemimandiblectomy). 6. The rate of recurrence was 9.5%. There was no recurrent cases following radical treatment. These results suggested that conservative surgical treatment is choice for ameloblastoma., 論文},
 pages = {11--17},
 title = {［原著］エナメル上皮腫の臨床所見と治療法に関する検討},
 volume = {24}
}