@article{oai:u-ryukyu.repo.nii.ac.jp:02016233,
 author = {宜保, 昌樹 and 安座間, 泰晴 and 運天, 忍 and 與儀, 彰 and 境, 昌弘 and 村山, 貞之 and Gibo, Masaki and Azama, Yasuharu and Unten, Shinobu and Yogi, Akira and Sakai, Masahiro and Murayama, Sadayuki},
 issue = {1･2},
 journal = {琉球医学会誌 = Ryukyu Medical Journal},
 note = {Thirty-two consecutive patients suspected of having pulmonary embolism underwent multi detector-row CT and were prospectively randomized to one of two intravenous contrast injection protocols. Protocol A (370 mg I/ml, total volume of 100 ml, and injection rate of 3.0 ml/sec) was applied in 15 patients, and protocol B (300 mg I/ml, 150 ml, and 3.0 ml/sec) in 17 patients. In early phase, CT values of the pulmonary artery and left atrium of protocol A were significantly higher than protocol B (P < 0.05). In delayed phase, CT values of the descending aorta, abdominal aorta, and inferior vena cava of protocol B were significantly higher than protocol A (P < 0.05). Venous enhancement of the lower extremities was equal between protocols. Our data suggest that protocol A is superior to protocol B in the diagnosis of pulmonary embolus, but inferior to protocol B in the diagnosis of inferior vena caval thrombus., 論文},
 pages = {27--31},
 title = {［原著］MDCTでの肺動脈塞栓症・深部静脈血栓症の同時評価における造影剤注入 プロトコールの検討－高濃度造影剤と高用量造影剤の比較－},
 volume = {29}
}