Item type |
デフォルトアイテムタイプ(フル)(1) |
公開日 |
2010-07-02 |
タイトル |
|
|
タイトル |
[原著]三尖弁置換術における機械弁(SJM弁)と生体弁(CE弁)の比較検討 : 置換時期と早期および遠隔成績 |
|
言語 |
ja |
タイトル |
|
|
タイトル |
Comparison between mechanical (SJM) and bioprosthetic (CE) valves in tricuspid valve replacement : Examination of the timing of valve replacement and early and late results |
|
言語 |
en |
作成者 |
上江洲, 徹
古謝, 景春
国吉, 幸男
宮城, 和史
下地, 光好
平良, 一雄
新垣, 勝也
摩文仁, 克人
Uezu, Toru
Koja, Kageharu
Kuniyoshi, Yukio
Miyagi, Kazufumi
Shimoji, Mitsuyoshi
Taira, Kazuo
Arakaki, Katsuya
Mabuni, Katsuhito
|
アクセス権 |
|
|
アクセス権 |
open access |
|
アクセス権URI |
http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2 |
権利情報 |
|
|
言語 |
ja |
|
権利情報 |
琉球医学会 |
主題 |
|
|
言語 |
en |
|
主題Scheme |
Other |
|
主題 |
Tricuspid valve replacement (TVR) |
主題 |
|
|
言語 |
en |
|
主題Scheme |
Other |
|
主題 |
St. Jude Medical valve |
主題 |
|
|
言語 |
en |
|
主題Scheme |
Other |
|
主題 |
Carpentier-Edwards valve |
内容記述 |
|
|
内容記述タイプ |
Other |
|
内容記述 |
Indications for tricuspid valve replacement (TVR) and the optimal prosthesis to use are still controversial. We examined the timing of TVR and the usefulness of St. Jude Medical (SJM) and Carpentier-Edwards (CE) valves retrospectively. The cases of 39 consecutive patients who underwent TVR at our hospital between 1976 and 1998 were reviewed. The patients were divided into initial operative group, comprising those who had TVR at the initial operation, and reoperative group, comprising those who had TVR at reoperation. Their ages, genders, diagnoses, used valves and necessity for re-TVR were analyzed for significant factors affecting prognosis. We also compared their ages, preoperative pulmonary capillary wedge pressures, pre- and postoperative right atrial pressures, preoperative cardiac indexes and survival rates of patients who had TVR with SJM valves with those who had TVR with CE valves. Although patients in the initial operative group were older than those in the reoperative group, there were no significant differences between the two groups in all factors. In comparing the patients with SJM valves versus those with CE valves, the CE patients were significantly older than the SJM patients (P=0.014), but no significant differences in the other factors were observed. Hospital mortality for all patients was 14.6% and late mortality was 17.1%. Actuarial survival rates at 5 and 10 years in all patients were 85.1% and 81.8%, respectively. The 5- and 10-year survival rates were 90.5% and 85.7%, respectively, in the patients undergoing TVR with SJM, whereas the rates in those who had TVR with CE were 81.8% and 81.8%, respectively. |
内容記述 |
|
|
内容記述タイプ |
Other |
|
内容記述 |
論文 |
出版者 |
|
|
出版者 |
琉球医学会 |
|
言語 |
ja |
出版者 |
|
|
出版者 |
Ryukyu Medical Association |
|
言語 |
en |
言語 |
|
|
言語 |
jpn |
資源タイプ |
|
|
資源タイプ識別子 |
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501 |
|
資源タイプ |
journal article |
出版タイプ |
|
|
出版タイプ |
VoR |
|
出版タイプResource |
http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85 |
収録物識別子 |
|
|
収録物識別子タイプ |
ISSN |
|
収録物識別子 |
1346888X |
収録物識別子 |
|
|
収録物識別子タイプ |
ISSN |
|
収録物識別子 |
0289-1530 |
収録物識別子 |
|
|
収録物識別子タイプ |
NCID |
|
収録物識別子 |
AN10369445 |
収録物名 |
|
|
収録物名 |
琉球医学会誌 = Ryukyu Medical Journal |
|
言語 |
ja |
書誌情報 |
巻 20,
号 2,
p. 67-70
|