Item type |
デフォルトアイテムタイプ(フル)(1) |
公開日 |
2019-11-29 |
タイトル |
|
|
タイトル |
The predictive validity of a modified Japanese Nursing Association fall risk assessment tool and its short-forms among neuropsychiatry inpatients |
|
言語 |
en |
作成者 |
Higaonna, Miki
Iramina, Mika
Kajiki, Yorie
Odo, Sumie
|
アクセス権 |
|
|
アクセス権 |
open access |
|
アクセス権URI |
http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2 |
権利情報 |
|
|
言語 |
ja |
|
権利情報 |
琉球医学会 |
主題 |
|
|
言語 |
en |
|
主題Scheme |
Other |
|
主題 |
inpatient falls |
主題 |
|
|
言語 |
en |
|
主題Scheme |
Other |
|
主題 |
neuropsychiatry |
主題 |
|
|
言語 |
en |
|
主題Scheme |
Other |
|
主題 |
nursing assessment |
主題 |
|
|
言語 |
en |
|
主題Scheme |
Other |
|
主題 |
reproducibility of results |
内容記述 |
|
|
内容記述タイプ |
Other |
|
内容記述 |
The fall risks of patients hospitalized for psychiatric disorders are often assessed using fall risk assessment tools that are not validated for psychiatric inpatients. This study aimed to assess the predictive validity of a modified Japanese Nursing Association (JNA) fall risk assessment tool and its short forms at different observation points (7, 14, 21, and 28 days) among patients admitted to a neuropsychiatry ward in a Japanese university hospital. This study utilized a retrospective cohort design. Participants were patients aged≧15 years, who were admitted between February 20, 2009 and December 31, 2016. Incident reports were reviewed to identify falls. The predictive validity was assessed using the area under the receiver operating characteristics curve, sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative likelihood ratios at the cut-off points of≧6 and≧7 for the modified risk assessment tool,≧3and≧5 for the short-form ver. 1, and≧4 and≧5 for the short-form ver.2. We found that neither the modified JNA tool, nor its short versions, achieved optimal sensitivity and specificity values of greater than 0.70 among 1,003 patients (median age 41 years, 71%women). The area under the receiver operating characteristics curves showed the highest values at the 7-day observation point in all three tools. The findings from this study suggest that fall risk assessment tools with sufficient predictive validity in non-psychiatric settings may not achieve an equivalent level of validity among psychiatric patients, and a different cut-off point may need to be considered. |
内容記述 |
|
|
内容記述タイプ |
Other |
|
内容記述 |
論文 |
出版者 |
|
|
出版者 |
琉球医学会 |
|
言語 |
ja |
出版者 |
|
|
出版者 |
Ryukyu Medical Association |
|
言語 |
en |
言語 |
|
|
言語 |
eng |
資源タイプ |
|
|
資源タイプ識別子 |
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501 |
|
資源タイプ |
journal article |
出版タイプ |
|
|
出版タイプ |
VoR |
|
出版タイプResource |
http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85 |
収録物識別子 |
|
|
収録物識別子タイプ |
ISSN |
|
収録物識別子 |
1346-888X |
収録物識別子 |
|
|
収録物識別子タイプ |
NCID |
|
収録物識別子 |
AN10369445 |
収録物名 |
|
|
収録物名 |
琉球医学会誌 = Ryukyu Medical Journal |
|
言語 |
ja |
書誌情報 |
巻 37,
号 1-4,
p. 51-59
|